<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:np="http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/ns/nonTEI" xml:id="NATP00056" type="transcription">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>'General Scholium' from the Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (1729)</title>
<author xml:id="in"><persName key="nameid_1" sort="Newton, Isaac" ref="nameid_1" xml:base="http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/catalogue/xml/persNames.xml">Isaac Newton</persName></author>

</titleStmt>
<extent><hi rend="italic">c.</hi> <num n="word_count" value="2197">2,197</num> words</extent>

<publicationStmt>
<authority>Enlightening Science Project</authority>
<pubPlace>Falmer</pubPlace>
<date>2009</date>
<publisher>Newton Project, University of Sussex</publisher>
<availability n="lic-text" status="restricted"><licence target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><p>This text is licensed under a <ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License</ref>.</p></licence></availability>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="metadataLine">1729, in English, <hi rend="italic">c.</hi> 2,193 words.</note>
<note n="blurb">
<p>What can science tell us about the existence of God, and about the nature of God if God does exist? These are the questions Newton addresses in his most original and influential discussion of the interface between science and religion. For Newton, God's existence is beyond dispute but we can no more understand his precise nature than a blind man can understand colour.</p>
</note>
<note n="language">
<p>in English</p>
</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><bibl type="simple" n="custodian_3" sortKey="zz-the_mathematical_principles_of_natural_philosophy,_vol._2_(london:_1729)." subtype="Printed"> <hi rend="italic">The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy</hi>, vol. 2 (London: 1729).</bibl>
<biblStruct>
<monogr>
<author><persName ref="nameid_1" xml:base="http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/catalogue/xml/persNames.xml"><forename>Isaac</forename> <surname>Newton</surname></persName></author>
<title>The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy</title>
<title type="short">Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy</title>
<imprint>
<biblScope type="vol">2</biblScope>
<pubPlace>London</pubPlace>
<publisher>Benjamin Motte</publisher>
<date>1729</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<origDate when="1729-01-01">1729</origDate>
<origPlace>England</origPlace>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="eng">English</language>
<language ident="lat">Latin</language>
<language ident="gre">Greek</language>
</langUsage>
<handNotes>
<handNote xml:id="printer" scribe="print">Print</handNote>
</handNotes>
</profileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<classDecl><taxonomy><category><catDesc n="Science">Science</catDesc></category></taxonomy></classDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2001-01-01" type="metadata">Catalogue information compiled by Rob Iliffe, Peter Spargo &amp; John Young</change>
<change when="2008-10-01"><name>Jeremy Schildt</name> began tagged transcription</change>
<change when="2009-06-08"><name>Jeremy Schildt</name> completed transcription</change>
<change when="2009-06-16" status="released"><name>John Young</name> updated metadata</change>
<change when="2011-09-29" type="metadata">Catalogue exported to teiHeader by <name>Michael Hawkins</name></change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text>
<body>
<div>
<pb xml:id="p387" n="387"/>
<head rend="center" xml:id="hd1"><hi rend="smallCaps">General Scholium</hi>.</head>
<p xml:id="par1">The hypothesis of Vortices is press'd with man<choice><sic><hi rend="large">y</hi></sic><corr>y</corr></choice> <lb xml:id="l1"/>difficulties. That every Planet by a radius drawn to <lb xml:id="l2"/>the Sun may describe areas proportional to the times <lb xml:id="l3"/>of description, the periodic times of the several parts <lb xml:id="l4"/>of the Vortices should observe the duplicate propor<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l5"/>tion of their distances from the Sun. But that the <lb xml:id="l6"/>periodic times of the Planets may obtain the sesqui<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l7"/>plicate proportion of their distances from the Sun, <lb xml:id="l8"/>the periodic times of the parts of the Vortex ought <lb xml:id="l9"/>to be in the sesquiplicate proportion of their distan<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l10"/>ces. That the smaller Vortices may maintain their lesser <lb xml:id="l11"/>revolutions about <hi rend="italic">Saturn, Jupiter</hi>, and other Planets, <lb xml:id="l12"/>and swim quietly and undisturb'd in the greater Vor<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l13"/>tex of the Sun, the periodic times of the parts of <lb xml:id="l14"/>the Sun's Vortex should be equal. But the rotation <lb xml:id="l15"/>of the Sun and Planets about their axes, which ought <lb xml:id="l16"/>to correspond with the motions of their Vortices, re<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l17"/>cede far from all these proportions. The motions of <lb xml:id="l18"/>the Comets are exceeding regular, are govern'd by the <lb xml:id="l19"/>same laws with the motions of the Planets, and can <lb xml:id="l20"/>by no means be accounted for by the hypothesis of <lb xml:id="l21"/> Vortices. For Comets are carry'd with very ec<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l22"/>centric motions through all parts of the heavens in<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l23"/>differently, with a freedom that is incompatible with <lb xml:id="l24"/>the notion of a Vortex.</p>
<fw type="catch" place="bottomRight">Bodies</fw><fw type="sig" place="pageBottom">Cc2</fw><pb xml:id="p388" n="388"/><fw type="pag" place="topLeft">388</fw><fw type="header" place="topCenter"> <hi rend="italic">Mathematical Principles</hi> Book III.</fw>
<p xml:id="par2">Bodies, projected in our air, suffer no resistance but <lb xml:id="l25"/>from the air. Withdraw the air, as is done in Mr. <lb xml:id="l26"/><hi rend="italic">Boyle's</hi> vacuum, and the resistance ceases. For in this <lb xml:id="l27"/>void a bit of fine down and a piece of solid gold de<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l28"/>scend with equal velocity. And the parity of reason <lb xml:id="l29"/>must take place in the celestial spaces above the Earth's <lb xml:id="l30"/>atmosphere; in which spaces, where there is no air to <lb xml:id="l31"/>resist their motions, all bodies will move with the <lb xml:id="l32"/>greatest freedom; and the Planets and Comets will <lb xml:id="l33"/>constantly pursue their revolutions in orbits given in <lb xml:id="l34"/>kind and position, according to the laws above ex<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l35"/>plain'd. But though these bodies may indeed perse<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l36"/>vere in their orbits by the mere laws of gravity, yet <lb xml:id="l37"/>they could by no means have at first deriv'd the re<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l38"/>gular position of the orbits themselves from those <lb xml:id="l39"/>laws</p>
<p xml:id="par3">The six primary Planets are revolv'd about the Sun, <lb xml:id="l40"/> in circles concentric with the Sun, and with motions <lb xml:id="l41"/> directed towards the same parts and almost in the same <lb xml:id="l42"/> plane. Ten Moons are revolv'd about the Earth, Ju<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l43"/>piter and Saturn, in circles concentric with them, with the <lb xml:id="l44"/> same direction of motion, and nearly in the planes of the <lb xml:id="l45"/>orbits of those Planets. But it is not to be conceived that <lb xml:id="l46"/>mere mechanical causes could give birth to so many <lb xml:id="l47"/>regular motions: since the Comets range over all parts <lb xml:id="l48"/>of the heavens, in very eccentric orbits. For by <lb xml:id="l49"/>that kind of motion they pass easily through the orbs <lb xml:id="l50"/>of the Planets, and with great rapidity; and in their <lb xml:id="l51"/>aphelions, where they move the slowest, and are de<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l52"/>tain'd the longest, they recede to the greatest distances <lb xml:id="l53"/>from each other, and thence suffer the least disturbance <lb xml:id="l54"/>from their mutual attractions. This most beautiful <lb xml:id="l55"/>System of the Sun, Planets and Comets, could only <lb xml:id="l56"/>proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent <lb xml:id="l57"/>and powerful being. And if the fixed Stars are the cen<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l58"/>ters of other like systems, these being form'd by the <lb xml:id="l59"/>like wise counsel, must be all subject to the dominion <fw type="catch" place="bottomRight">of</fw><pb xml:id="p389" n="389"/><fw type="pag" place="topRight"/><fw type="header" place="topCenter">Book III. <hi rend="italic">of Natural Philosophy.</hi></fw> of One; especially, since the light of the fixed Stars is of <lb xml:id="l60"/>the same nature with the light of the Sun, and from <lb xml:id="l61"/> every system light passes into all the other systems. <lb xml:id="l62"/>And lest the systems of the fixed Stars should, by their <lb xml:id="l63"/> gravity, fall on each other mutually, he hath placed <lb xml:id="l64"/>those Systems at immense distances one from another.</p>
<p xml:id="par4">This Being governs all things, not as the soul of <lb xml:id="l65"/>the world, but as Lord over all: And on account of <lb xml:id="l66"/>his dominion he is wont to be called <hi rend="italic">Lord God</hi> <foreign xml:lang="gre">παντο<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l67"/>κρáτωρ</foreign> or <hi rend="italic">Universal Ruler.</hi> For <hi rend="italic">God</hi> is a relative word, <lb xml:id="l68"/>and has a respect to servants; and <hi rend="italic">Deity</hi> is the dominion <lb xml:id="l69"/>of God, not over his own body, as those imagine who <lb xml:id="l70"/>fancy God to be the soul of the world, but over servants. <lb xml:id="l71"/> The supreme God is a Being eternal, infinite, absolutely <lb xml:id="l72"/>perfect; but a being, however perfect, without domi<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l73"/>nion, cannot be said to be Lord God; for we say, my <lb xml:id="l74"/>God, your God, the God of <hi rend="italic">Israel,</hi> the God of Gods, <lb xml:id="l75"/>and Lord of Lords; but we do not say, my Eternal, <lb xml:id="l76"/>your Eternal, the Eternal of <hi rend="italic">Israel,</hi> the Eternal of Gods; <lb xml:id="l77"/>we do not say, my Infinite, or my Perfect: These are <lb xml:id="l78"/>titles which have no respect to servants. The word <lb xml:id="l79"/><hi rend="italic">God</hi> usually <note n="a">Dr. <hi rend="italic">Pocock</hi> derives the Latin word <hi rend="italic">Deus</hi> from the <hi rend="italic">Arabic du,</hi> <lb xml:id="l80"/>(in the oblique case <hi rend="italic">di,)</hi> which signifies <hi rend="italic">Lord.</hi> And in this sense <lb xml:id="l81"/>Princes are called <hi rend="italic">Gods, <choice><abbr>Psal.</abbr><expan>Psalms</expan></choice></hi> lxxxii. ver. 6. and <hi rend="italic">John</hi> x. ver. 35. <lb xml:id="l82"/>And <hi rend="italic">Moses</hi> is called a <hi rend="italic">God</hi> to his brother <hi rend="italic">Aaron,</hi> and a <hi rend="italic">God</hi> to <hi rend="italic">Pha<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l83"/>raoh (<choice><abbr>Exod.</abbr><expan>Exodus</expan></choice></hi> iv. ver. 16. and vii. ver. 8. And in the same sense <lb xml:id="l84"/> the souls of dead Princes were formerly, by the Heathens, called <lb xml:id="l85"/><hi rend="italic">gods,</hi> but falsly, because of their want of dominion.</note> signifies <hi rend="italic">Lord;</hi> but every lord is not a God. <lb xml:id="l86"/>It is the dominion of a spiritual being which constitutes <lb xml:id="l87"/>a God; a true, supreme or imaginary dominion makes <lb xml:id="l88"/>a true, supreme or imaginary God. And from his true <lb xml:id="l89"/>dominion it follows, that the true God is a Living, Intel<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l90"/>ligent and Powerful Being; and from his other perfecti<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l91"/>ons, that he is Supreme or most Perfect. He is Eter<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l92"/>nal and Infinite, Omnipotent and Omniscient; that is, <lb xml:id="l93"/>his duration reaches from Eternity to Eternity; his <fw type="catch" place="bottomRight">presence</fw><pb xml:id="p390" n="390"/><fw type="pag" place="topLeft"/><fw type="header" place="topCenter"><hi rend="italic">Mathematical Principles</hi>Book III.</fw> presence from Infinity to Infinity; he governs all things, <lb xml:id="l94"/>and knows all things that are or can be done. He is not <lb xml:id="l95"/>Eternity or Infinity, but Eternal and Infinite; he is <lb xml:id="l96"/>not Duration or Space, but he endures and is present. <lb xml:id="l97"/>He endures for ever, and is every where present; and <lb xml:id="l98"/>by existing always and every where, he constitutes Du<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l99"/>ration and Space. Since every particle of Space is <hi rend="italic">al<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l100"/>ways,</hi> and every indivisible moment of Duration is <hi rend="italic">every</hi> <lb xml:id="l101"/><hi rend="italic">where,</hi>certainly the Maker and Lord of all things can<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l102"/>not be <hi rend="italic">never</hi> and <hi rend="italic">no where.</hi> Every soul that has perception is, though in different times and in different <lb xml:id="l103"/>organs of sense and motion, still the same indivisible <lb xml:id="l104"/>person. There are given successive parts in duration, <lb xml:id="l105"/>co-existant parts in space, but neither the one nor the <lb xml:id="l106"/>other in the person of a man, or his thinking principle; <lb xml:id="l107"/>and much less can they be found in the thinking sub<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l108"/>stance of God. Every man, so far as he is a thing that <lb xml:id="l109"/> has perception, is one and the same man during his <lb xml:id="l110"/>whole life, in all and each of his organs of sense. God <lb xml:id="l111"/>is the same God, always and every where. He is om<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l112"/>nipresent, not <hi rend="italic">virtually</hi> only, but also <hi rend="italic">substantially;</hi> for <lb xml:id="l113"/>virtue cannot subsist without substance. In him <note n="b">This was the opinion of the Ancients. so <hi rend="italic">Pythagoras</hi> in <hi rend="italic"><choice><abbr>Cicer.</abbr><expan>Cicero</expan></choice> <lb xml:id="l114"/><foreign xml:lang="lat">de <choice><abbr>Nat.</abbr><expan>Natura</expan></choice><choice><abbr>Deor.</abbr><expan>Deorum</expan></choice></foreign></hi> lib. i. <hi rend="italic">Thales, Anaxogoras, Virgil,</hi> Georg. lib. iv. <lb xml:id="l115"/>ver.220. and Æneid. lib. vi. ver. 721. <hi rend="italic">Philo <choice><abbr>Allegor.</abbr><expan>Allegory</expan></choice></hi> at the be<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l116"/>ginning of lib. i. <hi rend="italic">Aratus</hi> in his Phænom at the beginning. So <lb xml:id="l117"/>also the sacred Writers, as St. Paul, <hi rend="italic">Acts</hi> xvii. ver. 27, 28. St. <lb xml:id="l118"/><hi rend="italic">John's</hi> <choice><abbr>Gosp.</abbr><expan>Gospel</expan></choice> chap. xiv. ver. 2. <hi rend="italic">Moses</hi> in <hi rend="italic"><choice><abbr>Deut.</abbr><expan>Deuteronomy</expan></choice></hi> iv. ver. 39. and <lb xml:id="l119"/><seg rend="greek" rendition="greek">Σ</seg>. ver. 14. <hi rend="italic">David, Psal.</hi> cxxix. ver. 7, 8, 9. <hi rend="italic">Solomon</hi>, 1 <hi rend="italic">Kings</hi> viii. <lb xml:id="l120"/>ver. 27. <hi rend="italic">Job</hi> xvii. ver. 12, 13, 14. <hi rend="italic">Jeremiah</hi> xxiii. ver. 23, 24. <lb xml:id="l121"/> The Idolaters supposed the Sun, Moon and Stars, the Souls of <lb xml:id="l122"/>Men, and other parts of the world, to be parts of the supreme God, <lb xml:id="l123"/>and therefore to be worshipped; but erroneously.</note> are <lb xml:id="l124"/>all things contained and moved; yet neither affects <lb xml:id="l125"/>the other: God suffers nothing from the motion of <lb xml:id="l126"/>bodies; bodies find no resistance from the omnipresence <lb xml:id="l127"/>of God. 'Tis allowed by all that the supreme God <lb xml:id="l128"/>exists necessarily; and by the same necessity he exists <fw type="catch" place="bottomRight"><hi rend="italic">always</hi></fw><pb xml:id="p391" n="391"/><fw type="pag" place="topRight"/><fw type="header" place="topCenter">Book III. <hi rend="italic">of Natural Philosophy.</hi></fw> <hi rend="italic">always</hi> and <hi rend="italic">every where.</hi> Whence also he is all similar, <lb xml:id="l129"/> all eye, all ear, all brain, all arm, all power to perceive, to understand, and to act; but in a manner not at all <lb xml:id="l130"/>human, in a manner not at all corporeal, in a manner ut<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l131"/>terly unknown to us. As a blind man has no idea of <lb xml:id="l132"/> colours, so have we no idea of the manner by which the <lb xml:id="l133"/>all-wise God perceives and understands all things. He <lb xml:id="l134"/> is utterly void of all body and bodily figure, and can <lb xml:id="l135"/>therefore neither be seen, nor heard, nor touched; nor <lb xml:id="l136"/>ought to be worshipped under the representation of <lb xml:id="l137"/>any corporeal thing. We have ideas of his attributes, <lb xml:id="l138"/>but what the real substance of any thing is, we know <lb xml:id="l139"/>not. In bodies we see only their figures and colours, we <lb xml:id="l140"/> hear only the sounds, we touch only their outward <lb xml:id="l141"/> surfaces, we smell only the smells, and taste the favours; <lb xml:id="l142"/>but their inward substances are not to be known, either <lb xml:id="l143"/>by our senses, or by any reflex act of our minds; much <lb xml:id="l144"/>less then have we any idea of the substance of God. <lb xml:id="l145"/>We know him only by his most wise and excellent con<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l146"/>trivances of things, and final causes; we admire him <lb xml:id="l147"/>for his perfections; but we reverence and adore him on <lb xml:id="l148"/>account of his dominion. For we adore him as his ser<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l149"/>vants; and a God without dominion, providence, and <lb xml:id="l150"/>final causes, is nothing else but Fate and Nature. Blind <lb xml:id="l151"/>metaphysical necessity, which is certainly the same al<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l152"/>ways and every where, could produce no variety of <lb xml:id="l153"/>things. All that diversity of natural things which we <lb xml:id="l154"/>find, suited to different times and places, could arise <lb xml:id="l155"/>from nothing but the ideas and will of a Being necessa<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l156"/>rily existing. But by way of allegory, God is said to <lb xml:id="l157"/>see, to speak, to laugh, to love, to hate, to desire, to <lb xml:id="l158"/>give, to receive, to rejoice, to be angry, to fight, to <lb xml:id="l159"/>frame, to work, to build. For all our notions of God <lb xml:id="l160"/> are taken from the ways of mankind, by a certain simi<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l161"/>litude which, though not perfect, has some likeness <lb xml:id="l162"/>however. And thus much concerning God; to dis<fw type="catch" place="bottomRight"><lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l163"/>course</fw><pb xml:id="p392" n="392"/><fw type="pag" place="topLeft"/><fw type="header" place="topCenter"><hi rend="italic">Mathematical Principles</hi> Book III.</fw> course of whom from the appearances of things, does <lb xml:id="l164"/> certainly belong to Natural Philosophy.</p>
<p xml:id="par5">Hitherto we have explain'd the phænomena of the <lb xml:id="l165"/>heavens and of our sea, by the power of Gravity, but <lb xml:id="l166"/> have not yet assign'd the cause of this power. This <lb xml:id="l167"/>is certain, that it must proceed from a cause that pene<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l168"/>trates to the very centers of the Sun and Planets, without suffering the least diminution of its force; that <lb xml:id="l169"/>operates, not according to the quantity of the surfaces <lb xml:id="l170"/>of the particles upon which it acts, (as mechanical <lb xml:id="l171"/>causes use to do,) but according to the quantity of the <lb xml:id="l172"/>solid matter which they contain, and propogates its <lb xml:id="l173"/>virtue on all sides, to immense distances, decreasing al<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l174"/>ways in the duplicate proportion of the distances. Gra<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l175"/>vitation towards the Sun, is made up out of the gravi<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l176"/>tations towards the several particles of which the body <lb xml:id="l177"/>of the Sun is compos'd; and in receding from the Sun, <lb xml:id="l178"/>decreases accurately in the duplicate proportion of the <lb xml:id="l179"/>distances, as far as the orb of Saturn, as evidently ap<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l180"/>pears from the quiescence of the aphelions of the Pla<lb rend="hyphenated" xml:id="l181"/>nets; nay, and even to the remotest aphelions of the Co<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l182"/>mets, if those aphelions are also quiescent. But hither<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l183"/>to I have not been able to discover the cause of those <lb xml:id="l184"/>properties of gravity from phænomena, and I frame <lb xml:id="l185"/>no hypothesis. For whatever is not deduc'd from the <lb xml:id="l186"/>phænomena, is to be called an hypothesis; and hypo<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l187"/>theses, whether metaphysical or physical, whether of occult qualities or mechanical, have no place in expe<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l188"/>rimental philosophy. In this philosophy particular pro<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l189"/>positions are inferr'd from the phænomena, and after<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l190"/>wards render'd general by induction. Thus it was that <lb xml:id="l191"/>the impenetrability, the mobility, and the impulsive force <lb xml:id="l192"/>of bodies, and the laws of motion and of gravitation, were <lb xml:id="l193"/>discovered. And to us it is enough, that gravity does <lb xml:id="l194"/>really exist, and act according to laws which we <lb xml:id="l195"/>have explained, and abundantly serves to account for all <lb xml:id="l196"/> the motions of the celestial bodies, and of our sea.</p><fw type="catch" place="bottomRight">And</fw><pb xml:id="p393" n="393"/><fw type="pag" place="topRight"/><fw type="header" place="topCenter">Book III. <hi rend="italic">of Natural Philosophy.</hi></fw>
<p xml:id="par6">And now we might add something concerning a cer<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l197"/>tain most subtle Spirit, which pervades and lies hid in <lb xml:id="l198"/>all gross bodies; by the force and action of which Spi<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l199"/>rit, the particles of bodies mutually attract one another <lb xml:id="l200"/>at near distances, and cohere, if contiguous; and elec<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l201"/>tric bodies operate to greater distances, as well repelling <lb xml:id="l202"/>as attracting the neighbouring corpuscles; and light is <lb xml:id="l203"/>emitted, reflected, refracted, inflected, and heats bodies; <lb xml:id="l204"/>and all sensation is excited, and the members of animal <lb xml:id="l205"/>bodies move at the command of the will, namely, by <lb xml:id="l206"/>the vibrations of this Spirit, mutually propogated along <lb xml:id="l207"/>the solid filaments of the nerves, from the outward or<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l208"/>gans of sense to the brain, and from the brain into the <lb xml:id="l209"/>muscles. But these are things that cannot be explain'd <lb xml:id="l210"/>in few words, nor are we furnish'd with that sufficiency <lb xml:id="l211"/>of experiments which is required to an accurate deter<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l212"/>mination and demonstration of the laws by which this <lb xml:id="l213"/>electric and elastic spirit operates.</p></div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>