<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:np="http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/ns/nonTEI" xml:id="OTHE00042" type="transcription">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Letter to an unidentified addressee, 10 April 1732</title>
<author xml:id="fd"><persName key="nameid_28" sort="Fatio, Nicolas, de Duillier" ref="nameid_28" xml:base="http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/catalogue/xml/persNames.xml">Nicolas Fatio de Duillier</persName></author>

</titleStmt>
<extent><hi rend="italic">c.</hi> <num n="word_count" value="372">372</num> words</extent>

<publicationStmt>
<authority>Newton Project</authority>
<pubPlace>London</pubPlace>
<date>2006-11-06</date>
<publisher>Newton Project, Imperial College</publisher>
<availability n="lic-text" status="restricted"><licence target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><p>This text is licensed under a <ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License</ref>.</p></licence></availability>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="metadataLine">10 April 1732, in English, <hi rend="italic">c.</hi> 376 words, 1 p.</note>
<note n="pages">1 p.</note>
<note n="language">
<p>in English</p>
</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc><bibl type="simple" n="custodian_5" sortKey="keynes_ms._096(j)" subtype="Manuscript">Keynes Ms. 96(J), King's College, Cambridge, UK</bibl>
<msDesc>
<msIdentifier>
<country>UK</country><settlement>Cambridge</settlement><repository n="custodian_5">King's College</repository>
<collection>Keynes Mss</collection>
<idno n="Keynes Ms. 096(J)">Keynes Ms. 96(J)</idno>
</msIdentifier>
</msDesc>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<origDate when="1732-04-10">10 April 1732</origDate>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="eng">English</language>
</langUsage>
<handNotes>
<handNote sameAs="#fd">Holograph</handNote>
</handNotes>
</profileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<classDecl><taxonomy><category><catDesc n="PoliticalMatters">Political Matters</catDesc><category><catDesc n="FoiledAbductionOfWilliamOfOrange">Foiled abduction of William of Orange</catDesc></category></category></taxonomy></classDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2001-01-01" type="metadata">Catalogue information compiled by Rob Iliffe, Peter Spargo &amp; John Young</change>
<change when="2005-11-30" status="released">Transcribed from microfilm using Newton DTD 1x0 by <name xml:id="jy">John Young</name></change>
<change when="2006-12-01">Coding converted to modified TEI DTD and proofed by <name xml:id="mjh">Michael Hawkins</name></change>
<change when="2009-04-20">Updated to Newton V3.0 (TEI P5 Schema) by <name>Michael Hawkins</name></change>
<change when="2011-09-29" type="metadata">Catalogue exported to teiHeader by <name>Michael Hawkins</name></change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text>
<body>
<div>
<pb xml:id="p001" n="1"/>
<p xml:id="par1">10 April 1732</p>
<p xml:id="par2">Give me leave to return You my thanks, for the Letter You have been pleased to write to me. I doubt also, Sir, as You do Yourself, <lb xml:id="l1"/>whether any Notice will be taken of the part I had in securing, by a singular Providence, the Life and Liberty of King William, <lb xml:id="l2"/>when he was yet Prince of Orange. I shal think my Case very remarkable, if after my procuring with so much Danger the Publick <lb xml:id="l3"/>Good of England, I must not only be neglected here, but exposed also to the Resentment of the French Court.</p>
<p xml:id="par3">If my last to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Conduit had not been so long, I had some Thoughts of acquainting Him, That having considered it was very pro<lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l4"/>bable that, at the Time of reducing into Constellations the Celestial Sphere, the Middles of the Twelve Constellations of the Zodiack must <lb xml:id="l5"/>have fallen, in the main, nearly upon the Beginnings or <add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">upon</add> the Middles of the Dodecatemories; I have examined Whether that Supposition <lb xml:id="l6"/>agreed best with <choice><abbr>S<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></abbr><expan>Sir</expan></choice> Isaac Newton's Chronology, or with M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Whiston's Conclusion. And that, to my great Amazement, I found it agreed <lb xml:id="l7"/>most perfectly with the first. This Observation, I believe, will please M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Conduit. If Sir Isaac was moved by it, which is not impossible, <lb xml:id="l8"/>I don't know how it came to pass, that He took no notice of it. But as to the Chronology itself, If M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Conduit be pleased to send me Petavii <lb xml:id="l9"/>Uranologium, I have a Method that has escaped both <choice><abbr>S<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></abbr><expan>Sir</expan></choice> Isaac and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Whiston's Penetration, by which I can demonstratively decide the <lb xml:id="l10"/>matter. I dare not guess before hand, for which of them the Controversy will be determined.</p>
<p xml:id="par4">I hope, Sir, M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Conduit will be pleased to take in my favour the best course, in reference to the Petition which I sent Him. Some of <lb xml:id="l11"/>my Friends here think, that if He will espouse my Interest, something will certainly be done for me. But if He does not succeed, that <lb xml:id="l12"/>can be no Disgrace but to such as oppose a Thing so just in itself. I most humbly desire to be soon acquainted with any Steps that shal <lb xml:id="l13"/>be taken in it.</p>
<p xml:id="par5">I am, with much Respect and Gratitude,</p>
<p rend="indent10" xml:id="par6">Sir,</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>