Letter from Arthur Storer to Humphrey Babington, dated 19 September 1678
Sir
According to my desire I have Receved from Mr Newton that kindeness of' your promiss: which weare Conserning that Small Table of' mine wch was of' the North Star's Hourly Altitude & Azimuth The Contents of' wch Answer is in theese Lines: Cambridge Sept 11th: 1678 Mr Storer I have Looked over your tables of' the North Star's hourly Altitudes & Azimuth: & doe not perceive but that they ar Suff'iciently {sic} Exact{.}
But if yt I should presisely have sett downe the the minnute & fractionall part of' a minute as my Calculatio Gave it & by the very same Radius by wch that table of' the North Star's Azimuth was Calculated then it will shew it as followeth for those hours parts of a minute wch is for ye Hours of: & for yeHours: : parts of \a min/ But for the Hours of Both Sixes: wch is the Stars distance from the pole: But if I should have beene so presise wth the degrees minutes & fractionall part of a Minute & so neare as was shewed by the calculation wch would have beene To the Thousand part of' a Minute or less: therfore I suppose it would have beene very Hard Tedious & Troblesome to have whroug\ht/ the same so neare by the Altitude: as I {illeg}|di|d there without it & by such a duble way of' working that no Less then 4 Hours Azim\{illeg}|u|th/ was shewed by the produce of' one simple multiplication casting away some five figures then Adding the Remainer To or Substrac\ting/ from a Nother constant given Summ: which is allwayes the same for ye Lat' & Hour given But for ye said tables he wrighteth that he doth not perceive but that they ar Sufficently Exact: Onley whether the Rule which I have computed the tables therby be Mathematically exact so yt with {sic} without Error danger of' error it may be used to Compute the Altitudes & Azimuths of' Stars which ar very Remoate from the pole I \he/ cannot tell that he wrighteth is onley to be knowne from the demonstration of' the Rule grounded on Mathematicall principles for wch I think this same of' myne is & if he receve my Letter dated \about/ Sept ye 4 or 5th: he will see by it a table of' the Sunn or Stars Hourly Azimuth for Every 4th degree of' the Sun{illeg}|s| \or Stars/ declination from ye Equinoctiall to Eather north or South: wch declination\s/ is Remoat from ye pole wch I Calculated for ye Latitud of' wch is shewed|th| very neare your Lat' at Cambridge Because he might the sooner Looke it over without troble any great troble for so it may chance yt he may have them Allreddye callculated for yt or your Lat' by him: But because I have beene at yt panes To make these tables universall being halfe Calculated for All Latitudes vizd: from ye Equinoctiall To ye Pole I shall Heare Lay downe the Grounds of' theare proportions of' the Sun\s/ or any Stars Hourly Azimuth
The use of' these Tables is thus for ye Sun or any Stars Hourly Azimuth for these Latitudes the Declination being given multiply the sum of' the Root of ye Hourly Azimuth, for ye Hour & Lat' suppoased: by the Tangent of the Sun or Stars declination: Cutt of foure figuers To ye Right hand from the product: The Remaner being added to or Substracted from the Equinoctiall hours Tangent of Azimuth: sheweth the Tangent of the hours Azimuth being counted from ye East or West. Example Lat' 52: the Declination North I demand the Azimuth at :10 in ye morning & :2: in the Affter noon: & at :6: in ye mor & 6 past {noo\ne/} at 2. in the morning & 10 at night at theese six hours I demand the Sun or Stars Azimuth: Aganst ye Lat' 52 under ye hour /Three sums Heare I finded by Addition: Substr & ye produce \/ wch sums sheweth ye = sheweth the Tangt of 6 Hours Azimuth Thus{.}\
<3:1v>First I finde by Substracting 4482: out of ye \ye Equ Tangt/ 13648 Rest 9166: wch sum is the Tangent of for ye Azimth: of .10: mor & .2: past noon{.} Secondly I finde by Adding of — 4482 To — 13648: facit 18130: wch Sum is the Tangent of : for ye Azimth: at 2 in ye mor & at 10 at night{.} Lastly the halfe of — 4482 is — 2241: wch Sum is the Tangent of : for ye Azimth: at 6 in ye mor & 6: past noone{.} Thus by this Rule you finde 6 Hours Azimuth p the produce of one small multiplication: shewd by Additio Subst & the Sum{.} Againe I demand the Azimuth for theese 4 Hours of the day or night vizd for ye Hour of 9 in ye mor or 3 past noone, 9 at nigh or 3 in \mor/ The declinat , Lat' :
Heare I finde by substracting 3169 out of 7880: Rest 4711 : wch is the Tangent of : wch is ye Azimuth for 9 in ye mor or 3 past noon{.} But if I Add {illeg} 3169 to — 7880: facit 11049 wch sum is the Tangent of wch is ye Azim at 3 in ye mor or 9 at night for North decli{.} But ye Contrary hours for South declination: thus you may doe for any of yt; said Latitudes to any Hour & declination{.}
To finde the Tangent of the Equinoctiall Hours Azimuth is Thus: Multiplye the Tangent of ye Hours distance from :6: by the Sine of ye Latitude Cut of 4 figures & ye Remaner is the Tangent of ye Azimuth: the Radius being 10000: To finde the Roote of Azimuth: or Tangent of of declination: Multiply ye Cosine of ye Latitude being doubled by the Secant of the hour Being counted from :6: Cutt of 4 figures to ye Right hand from the product; then ha{illeg}|l|fe the Remaner shall be the desired Sum for the Roote of ye Hours Azimuth: Now if you Add \or Substract/ this Root of ye Hours Azimuth To the Tangent{illeg} of the saide Equinoctiall \Hours/ Azimuth it will shew the Tangent of ye hours Azimuth for of Declination: Heare I have shewd|e|d the proportions by wch I Calculated the Sun' & The North Star's Hourly Azimuth wch I would have done when I sent Mr Newton my Last Table of ye Sun's Hourly Azimuth wch I could not then doe by Reason of ye shortness of my Time: Therefore I would Intreat your favour if yt you pleace d|T|o do me that kindness once moore as to lett \desire/ him to Looke over theese proportions To see whether they hold Good yea or not for I have bestoed so much paines wth them{.} In the Same Manner as I have shewed you by the Tables Heare \made/ universall: Tables for All Latitudes vizd from ye Equinoctiall to ye Pole{.} Therefore if Mr Newton could doe me yt faivour as to Resolve me of wch in 6 or 8 dayes affter the dait of this He would much Oblidge me thereby: Haveing no moore at prsent But Returning you many thanc{illeg}|k|s for your Trouble & Great G kindeness at Boothby & Elcewhear with my True Love & Service To Mr Newton Returning him many thancks for his kindeness I Rest at yor Command your Nepheu to Seve you Arthur Storer
London Sept 19th: 1678
Thanckes be to God All wth us heare ar very well: \hopeing ye like wth you{.}/ I was wth Coz Wm King this day who is very well & I hope will do well{.} Both hee & Shee mindes there buisness very Cloacely & I hope yt he will have a very great helpe by her Especially in the Consernes of his trayde he imployeth a boy aprentice & a Jorneyman: All of wch I finde usally very hard at worke{.}
<3:2v>For the Reverend Doct Humphry
Babington at Trenitye Colidge
In Cambridge
{4}